EXPANDRIVE VS TRANSMIT HOW TO
EXPANDRIVE VS TRANSMIT CODE
EXPANDRIVE VS TRANSMIT PROFESSIONAL
EXPANDRIVE VS TRANSMIT MAC

EXPANDRIVE VS TRANSMIT PROFESSIONAL

Becoming more professional at what you do doesn't mean it's getting any easier. When I started web development I simply couldn't see many of these issues.

So what's really the problem here? I'm afraid after all these years I simply got to a point on the learning curve that is high enough to see all these things properly. Great things happened that made my work a lot easier (like Chrome DevTools or Directus). But there are also a lot more tools and platforms to chose from. Yes, many things changed and many got more complicated. I also spend time casting some properties back and forth because JSON is quite limited when it comes to typing.ĬORS. And while that still works, of course, I now find myself writing DTOs for every model, at least for Create and Update, sometimes for more specific actions. With Laravel 3 I would simply return an object I got from the database, it would then be converted to JSON automatically and wrapped in an HTTP response. I love it and it scares me at the same time. Today containerization makes deployment so much better and so much more complicated at the same time. But aside from that deployment was simple. I even recall writing a very angry e-mail to ExpanDrive once because it messed up my files, which was a great pain because I wasn't using Git back then.

EXPANDRIVE VS TRANSMIT CODE

I used to just synchronize my code to some server using Transmit. I need tests, but when I'm working on a side-project I would rather work on the actual software. Nowadays I do, of course, and I wouldn't stop doing it, but testing APIs feels so repetitive and time consuming. I'm actually not sure if testing just wasn't a thing in Laravel 3, or if my junior dev ass just ignored it, but I didn't do any automated testing.

But I'm missing a solid authentication solution in the Node.js world. With frameworks like Fastify I can come up with my own architecture, which I really enjoy. I feel like I can make more choices there. That's when I look at Node.js frameworks like Adonis, Nest or Fastify. Sometimes I would prefer it to be a little smaller. I don't think it has become harder to understand or to learn, there is just more of it. It has always felt magical, but also difficult to understand what's going on behind the scenes. Laravel is great! But it also became a bit overwhelming. But somehow I still feel uneasy leaving normalized data and my neatly organized migrations behind. MongoDB on the other side is so much fun when it comes to nested objects. Most of the time this also leads to more models, more APIs, more tests, etc. But when you're designing a slightly more complex data structure, you end up with lot's of tables, very quickly. At this point they both feel like a bad choice. But now, all I can see are the problems it has compared to GraphQL which is so great on the client side and such a pain on the server side. Oftentimes I want to authorize an action depending on who a given object belongs to. My problem with most authorization solutions is though that they have users and roles and groups, but no concept of ownership.

There are systems and libraries ready to go and they're great.

EXPANDRIVE VS TRANSMIT HOW TO

How to undelete it.This has always been difficult. You accidentally deleted your entire Apple Photos library.Never tried an IDE? I've outlined some of the benefits over a standard text editor. How I'm trying to measure and reduce my business carbon footprint Author William Turrell Posted on JJCategories Blog Tags macOS, sftp, ssh Post navigation

Possibly the thing to get instead if you really need it is Transmit ($45), though I have gone back to moving files via the command line. I asked if they operated a test server, which would be useful for diagnosing problems as they could use it to check the logs at their end. Their apps are still actively developed, but if one doesn’t work and they can’t help you… I believe it’s quite a small team (though more than one). There are log files, but they weren’t massively useful.ĭidn’t get far with their live support.

EXPANDRIVE VS TRANSMIT MAC

This is on Mac running macOS Mojave 10.14.6. Expandrive is a program that lets you mount external connections (SSH servers, Google Drive etc.) as volumes on a Mac, so you can drag/drop/save/load as if they were local.īoth the old version I had (6.4.7) and the newest release of version 7 essentially won’t connect to anything at all for me – either servers I run myself or Google Drive/Dropbox (in the case of the last two they get stuck in an infinite loop.)

Expandrive vs transmit